science

Why Do We Crave That Forbidden Love?

When Forbidden Love Meets Social Approval – The Complex Dance of Relationships and Reactance Theory

Why Do We Crave That Forbidden Love?

If someone put a big red button in front of you and told you not to press it, would you resist? For many, this warning only intensifies the temptation. Why do we often crave what’s forbidden?

Psychologists call this reactance theory. Reactance is that strong urge to reclaim our freedom when it feels threatened. When told “no,” some get frustrated, argue, or just do the exact opposite of what they were told. This visible in everyday life—from ignoring health warnings we find annoying to kids defying parents’ rules.

Interestingly, not all forbidden things become irresistible. In 1972, psychologists at the University of Colorado explored if parents’ disapproval strengthens or weakens romantic relationships. They assessed 140 couples over six months. Couples who sensed parental opposition reported growing closer. They dubbed this the “Romeo and Juliet Effect,” suggesting reactance was driving their love to flourish.

Since then, new studies argue against this effect. Most findings reveal that romantic relationships fare better with friends’ and family’s approval. Known as the Social Network Effect, this trend shows that perceived support predicts long-term relationship success.

Why doesn’t reactance overpower the Social Network Effect? It could be because we value our current relationships more than potential ones. Friends and family disapproval doesn’t usually lead to dramatic ultimatums; it’s more about expressing concerns or withholding support. Those with good parental relationships feel free to ignore parents’ advice, while those with poor parental ties often don’t care about their opinions.

If disapproved relationships often fail, does this mean we won’t fight for our choice in partners? It might depend on the individual. There are theories suggesting two types of reactance: defiant and independent. A defiant person will do the opposite of what’s told, like shouting when asked to lower their voice. An independent person chooses what they believe is right, ignoring the request.

In the context of relationships, a defiant person might secretly pursue a romance, yet still feel the group’s disapproval. Conversely, an independent person might disregard friends’ concerns and continue loving who they want.

Researchers are still exploring defiant and independent reactance theories. These ideas highlight the push and pull between wanting independence and the need for social acceptance. Everyone balances these desires differently, but our social networks are crucial to our identity and well-being. Studies show that support from close friends can counter others’ disapproval, leading to stronger relationships.

While it might not match the drama of forbidden love, having a supportive network beats a doomed affair. Just like Romeo and Juliet, who couldn’t survive extreme disapproval, most relationships thrive better with social support.



Similar Posts
Blog Image
Is the Electric Vehicle Revolution Truly Green or Just a Smokescreen?

Diving Deeper into the True Environmental Impact of Electric Vehicles

Blog Image
What Lies About Money Are Keeping You Poor?

Untangling the Deceptive Web of Financial Myths to Secure Real Wealth

Blog Image
Could You Imagine Living Without Words? How Aphasia Reveals the Power of Language

Connecting the Threads of Language: Aphasia’s Hidden Battleground

Blog Image
How Do Beavers Engineer Marvels Visible from Space?

Pioneering Beavers: Nature's Master Architects Creating Life-Sustaining Ecosystems

Blog Image
Is Time the Real Key to Meeting Across Dimensions?

Meeting a Friend in a Four-Dimensional Universe: The Essential Role of Time

Blog Image
Vaccines and the Future of Pandemic Prevention

Vaccine innovations, like mRNA and nanoparticle technologies, promise faster development and broader protection against future pandemics. Proactive vaccinology aims to create vaccines for potential threats, while ensuring global access remains crucial.